Australia cancels 20,000 visas; tightens immigration rules
| February 8th, 2010 | By: Bijoy Bora | Category: Featured
Melbourne: In a bid to curb ‘back door’ permanent residency through its skilled migration scheme, Australian government has decided to overhaul the immigration rules which is likely to affect over 20,000 visa applicants, including Indians.
The changes would focus on overhauling of the queueing system that identifies occupations in demand and creates a points system.
The Immigration Minister would have the new legal authority to set a maximum number of visas for a single occupation. The state governments would be asked to develop new migration plans.
The Australian immigration department would tightened the rules from today, ‘The Age’ reported.
Foreign students, who have a qualification for an occupation which is no longer in demand, could apply for a temporary 18-month visa.
This would allow them to gain work experience and give a foreign graduate time to find an employer willing to sponsor their application as a skilled migrant, and if they failed in their attempt they will have to return to their country of origin.
The cancelled applications apply to all offshore general skilled migration claims lodged before September 2007.
For onshore overseas students, government would introduce transitional arrangements to apply until 2012.
The new system would set a new list of occupations in demand and expected to favour skilled workers including nurses, general medical practitioners, mechanical engineers and teachers instead of groups such as cooks and hairdressers.
Meanwhile, Immigration Minister Chris Evans was likely to argue that the skilled migration program had not worked in Australia’s economic or demographic interests.
“The program has been delivering self-nominated migrants from a narrow range of occupations with poor to moderate English language skills who struggle to find employment in their nominated occupation,” Senator Evans said.
He was also likely to acknowledge the impact of changes on the foreign students, but said “they can still gain residency if they gain qualifications in professions that are in demand”, The Age reported.
He said the current tensions and misunderstandings have been made worse by unscrupulous migration agents.
“[These agents] have been misleading many international students into believing that a course in Australia gave them an automatic entitlement to permanent residence,” Senator Evans said. “It does not, and it will not.”
Evans would also argue that the government supports skilled migration and continues to want migrants, “be they from India, the United Kingdom or China – our three largest source countries or elsewhere”.
Wasim Akram slams bans on players
An orgasm a day keeps illnesses away
Will Rajiv Gandhi’s killer be freed?
Hema Malini house robbery case solved, 5 arrested
Facebook killer sentenced to life
SP, RJD withdraw support from UPA govt over women’s bill
Terrorists may attack airports: CISF
The Oscar Award winners are…
Sandra Bullock wins best actress Oscar for “Blind Side”
Indian companies to hire more women this year
First, it sends mixed messages:
Evans said that enrolling in a course in AU “does not and will not” grant those foreign students an automatic PR. Yet he says the country will allow an 18 month “transition period” to allow students to try and find an employer to sponsor them to get the PR. What message is he trying to send here? This seems very contradicting. Does he want foreigners to get PR’s or not?
Second, it’s unfair to the honorable ones:
This new policy may benefit australia economically, but it is unfair to those students who came to australia to study to pursue their passion and at the same time to obtain the life and job that they want. Now they are being kicked out and asked to go back to their country of origin just because australia doesnt “need” them? Doesn’t seem right….
First, it sends mixed messages:
Evans said that enrolling in a course in AU “does not and will not” grant those foreign students an automatic PR. Yet he says the country will allow an 18 month “transition period” to allow students to try and find an employer to sponsor them to get the PR. What message is he trying to send here? This seems very contradicting. Does he want foreigners to get PR’s or not?
Second, it’s unfair to the honorable ones:
This new policy may benefit australia economically, but it is unfair to those students who came to australia to study to pursue their passion and at the same time to obtain the life and job that they want. Now they are being kicked out and asked to go back to their country of origin just because australia doesnt “need” them? Doesn’t seem right….